|
|
 |
 |
Information About Selling Art Work And Art Supplies on Art Street |
| Here Is A Place To Meet For All Art Lovers. But We Have Several Others Art Cafes. Check If One Of Them Is More Right For You. And If You Want To Open A New Art Cafe On Our Plaza - Please, Submit Your Suggestion Here. |
|
For you information -
If you own a website that related to selling art work you are welcome to participate in our website.
Contact us to be participate in the project and join our partner list: Art Wiki, Art Online Portal, Art Register Central, etc.
|
 |
Website about Selling Art - online portal of Art gallery worldwide. Other useful information: Fast Company weblog" /
Artist Account - If you are an artist (or its agent) who wants to exhibit and/or sell your artwork. You will be able to exhibit and sell artwork of only one artist. You'll have your own home page presenting you, your artwork and more
Gallery Account - If you are a gallery with exhibitions and many artists. You will have full size website under your own name, including your own logo, news, articles, exhibitions, artists, online catalog and more
Sell art online - In order to sell art online a gallery needs to have a high ranked websites. The traffic is critical issue and could be
handle only by professionals.
Sell my art online - In case 'to sell my art online by myself' gallery or artist must consider both the development and support of its own website. Traffic, security, new technology.
| | Fast Company Now - How Smart People Work
Reader's Network
The Wal-Mart Blog: Day One
Fast Company senior writer Charles Fishman , who has been with the magazine since Issue #1, is the author of a bestselling book about Wal-Mart, The Wal-Mart Effect , which grew out of a story he wrote for Fast Company called, "The Wal-Mart You Don’t Know." (A chapter of the book was excerpted in Fast Company ’s January/February issue, "The Man Who Said No to Wal-Mart .")
The Wal-Mart Effect has caused quite a stir — Fishman has been interviewed on NPR and CNN, reviewed everywhere from Business Week and USA Today to the Denver Post , and the book spent three weeks on the bestseller lists of both the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal . The Economist said The Wal-Mart Effect is "the most satisfying" of the Wal-Mart books, and "has frequent unexpected insights." The Economist then used the book’s ideas to frame its own story on Wal-Mart — "Measuring the Wal-Mart effect."
We’ve asked Charles Fishman to guest-host the Fast Company blog this week, to do a series of postings on the ways Wal-Mart is talking about changing its business; to look at how seriously we should take those changes; to consider their possible wider impact, and Wal-Mart’s chances for success.
Continue reading "The Wal-Mart Blog: Day One"
| Category: wal-mart
Crowds: Not As Smart When It Comes to Hollyweird
So what can we learn from this exercise (besides not to use the phrase dumbass in FC Now posts and that you shouldn't rely on MIVA in future Oscar pools)? The Wisdom of Crowds is a provocative idea and a potentially powerful tool for business in expanding its pool of ideas and finding solutions that a small set of people wouldn't make. But it's not a particularly good predictor of the outcome of a Byzantine process that involves an insular community. What a Wisdom of Crowds approach would be good at is finding performances and creative achievements that resonated within the moviegoing community but that may have been overshadowed in Hollywood for whatever reason (poor box office, distribution, etc).
Fast Company Now
@import "http://www.fastcompany.com/css/blog.css";
Skip to the content of this page
Advanced options
Site Navigation
Home
Magazine
Archives
Guides
Weblog
Book Club
Fast 50
Fast Companies
Events
Magazine Resources
SUBSCRIBE ›
renew ›
current issue ›
contact us ›
FC NOW: The Fast Company Weblog
The opinions of individual Fast Company Now contributors don't necessarily reflect the editorial position of Fast Company magazine as a whole.
March 06, 2006
Posted by Charles Fishman at 12:55 PM
| 2 Comments
So I think commenter Richard E. Smallman summed it up in the comments to my last post , when he wrote, "Well Dumbass, u got 1 right.Better luck next year if u still have a job." (Of course, my corporate overlords have seen fit to cut that comment, not me. We're all adults here.) I'm not worried about my job, because I did better than the Wisdom of Crowds angle presented by MIVA's analysis of more than two billion search queries. I got three correct (best supporting actress, best director, and best actress). MIVA did get just one correct: Rachel Weisz, for best supporting actress.
|
|
| |
|